On this page: Electronic formsDownloadable documentsRelated linksContact information

Agents Forum/Planning News

FEEDBACK FROM AGENTS FORUM HELD ON 27 JANUARY 2010 AT THE GREENHILL HOTEL, WIGTON

Total Attendees:                                     22

Feedback received from the following ten attendees plus six anonymous:

Peter Winter

-

PFK Planning

Ian Arnott

-

Eatonfield Developments Limited

Vicky Hannah

-

Home Northwest

Ken Thompson

-

Coniston Consultants

Jack Thornton

-

Edwin Thompson & Co

Paul Kitchen

-

Green Design Group

Rachael Lightfoot

-

Story Homes

Neil Henderson

-

H & H Bowe

Darren Ward

-

Red Raven Design

Ric Outhwaite

-

arROw Planning

Results from Feedback Forms:               16

SHLAA’s

                                       Interesting                        100%

                                       Relevant                           100%

                                       Informative                       100%

                                       Understandable               100%

Comments:

  • Relevant as overall guide, especially constraints section.  Lack of highways investment is a big constraint for Allerdale and Copeland.
  • Good to find out that the work already done does not mean site is not going to guarantee a planning approval.
  • Would have benefited if there had been greater confidence over next steps and the timing and method of consultation.

FLOOD RISK AND PPS25:

                                       Interesting                        100%

                                       Relevant                           100%

                                       Informative                       100%

                                       Understandable               100%

Comments:

  • Should have explained the actual mechanics of carrying out the Flood Risk Assessment (FRA).
  • Good presentation.  Hope the recent flooding problems in Cumbria do not end up with a knee jerk reaction and increase areas rather than look at what caused the problem.

RENEWALS / AMENDMENTS / VALIDATION / PROTECTED SPECIES:

                                       Interesting                        100%

                                       Relevant                             93%

                                       Informative                         94%

                                       Understandable                 94%

 

Comments:

  • Not sure about difference between non-material and minor amendments.  If non-material, should permission be required?
  • A standard ‘update’ page on website would be very useful, but would need to be up-to-date and kept that way.
  • Liked the idea of the newspaper ‘read all about it’.  Look forward to more of these in the future.
  • Protected Species:  Interesting to compare costs of engaging consultants and carrying out mitigation as part of the overall development costs of a project – never underestimate consultants’ fees.
  • Lack of clarity of Allerdale Borough Council’s approach.

SPATIAL OPTIONS:

                                       Interesting                          75%

                                       Relevant                             87%

                                       Informative                         81%

                                       Understandable                69%

Comments:

  • An event purely for the LDF, once approved, would be very useful.
  • Very poor as slides were unreadable and no copies in information pack.
  • Poor presentation and difficult to understand as a result.
  • Difficult to follow, disjointed, writing too small to read.
  • Difficult to understand.
  • Poor presentation with no real purpose.

COCKERMOUTH FLOOD RECOVERY AND PLANNING IMPLICATIONS:

                                       Interesting                        100%

                                       Relevant                             87%

                                       Informative                         94%

                                       Understandable              100%

Comments:

  • Questionable content re past flooding events and severity.
  • A well balanced presentation with good background information and addressing a positive way forward for the future.
  • Very informative presentation.  Interesting.  Enjoyable to listen to.
  • Very good.  Use as a ‘recovery model’ for other flood disasters.  Have all shop fronts and buildings photographed as a record.

Feedback on event as a Whole:

Would you recommend the event to others?                            100%

Have you found the event useful?                                              100%

Would you attend future Agents Forums?                                 100%

Areas agents would like to see covered in future:

Planning Portal – The Planning Portal Area Manager has attended previous events and it would be useful to hear of recent changes / updates.

Natural England – Protected Species.

Revisit planning update at regular intervals.

Impact of current planning issues on historic / listed buildings.

Affordable housing requirements and how need information is ascertained.

Spatial Model, need clearer information.

CONSTRUCTIVE COMMENTS:

Well worth attending, keeps one in touch.

Overall a good event and in the main very informative; just a shame the slides on Spatial Options were poor.

Really very useful.

Questions/answers could be time limited.

Well organised event in a good venue.  Cracking lunch.

It is a positive that Allerdale Borough Council continues to organise the event and it should be given positive publicity.

SUGGESTIONS:

Conservation opportunities in Workington.

Would be useful to include officers from other Cumbrian planning authorities to encourage them to hold similar events, increase understanding of issues faced by planning consultants / planning officers, etc.

 

 

 

 

                                                                                           

 


last updated 01 February 2010